<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Philosophy to go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Where science meets philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:46:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interview with Eugenio Trías by judith schwartzbacker</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=2473&#038;cpage=1#comment-9768</link>
		<dc:creator>judith schwartzbacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=2473#comment-9768</guid>
		<description>i was wndering if there are any plans for an english translation of  trias&#039; philosophy and carnival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was wndering if there are any plans for an english translation of  trias&#8217; philosophy and carnival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Eternity to Here &#8211; By Sean Carroll by Blake Stacey</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=2781&#038;cpage=1#comment-7467</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 16:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=2781#comment-7467</guid>
		<description>One thing I&#039;ve noticed is that every &quot;interpretation&quot; of quantum mechanics bills itself as &quot;quantum mechanics taken seriously&quot;.  This is not limited to the many-worlds view (or rather, all the many flavours thereof), but also includes the consistent historians (&lt;i&gt;e.g.,&lt;/i&gt; Gell-Mann, Griffiths, Hartle, Hohenberg), the Quantum Bayesians (&lt;i&gt;e.g.,&lt;/i&gt; Caves, Fuchs, Schack, Appleby) and even the latter-day Copenhageners (&lt;i&gt;e.g.,&lt;/i&gt; Asher Peres).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I&#8217;ve noticed is that every &#8220;interpretation&#8221; of quantum mechanics bills itself as &#8220;quantum mechanics taken seriously&#8221;.  This is not limited to the many-worlds view (or rather, all the many flavours thereof), but also includes the consistent historians (<i>e.g.,</i> Gell-Mann, Griffiths, Hartle, Hohenberg), the Quantum Bayesians (<i>e.g.,</i> Caves, Fuchs, Schack, Appleby) and even the latter-day Copenhageners (<i>e.g.,</i> Asher Peres).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interview with Marcelo Pakman by Rosa de los Angeles</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=2652&#038;cpage=1#comment-6808</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosa de los Angeles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=2652#comment-6808</guid>
		<description>Excelente entrevista! Gracias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excelente entrevista! Gracias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interview with Reyes Mate by Vicente</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=2562&#038;cpage=1#comment-5561</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=2562#comment-5561</guid>
		<description>As an add in to the former comment: I mean, philoshophers message should stop curving (as if it was a old-fashioned institution(i.e Religion)) the future by paralizing and non evolving ethics. 

Imposing self-boundaries in what at least tends to be natural and which is the selection by evolution of a characteristic: intelligence. If we can get more skills, more functionalities...why should we stop now? If we play to replicate infinites of possibilities, skills, functions, power as if we were gods, I just say, let&#039;s play it seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an add in to the former comment: I mean, philoshophers message should stop curving (as if it was a old-fashioned institution(i.e Religion)) the future by paralizing and non evolving ethics. </p>
<p>Imposing self-boundaries in what at least tends to be natural and which is the selection by evolution of a characteristic: intelligence. If we can get more skills, more functionalities&#8230;why should we stop now? If we play to replicate infinites of possibilities, skills, functions, power as if we were gods, I just say, let&#8217;s play it seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interview with Reyes Mate by Vicente</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=2562&#038;cpage=1#comment-5560</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=2562#comment-5560</guid>
		<description>My interpretation of your point with respect freedom goes as follows. I agree with understanding freedom as the abscence or lack of conditioning. However, there is no freedom from all possible scopes with respect the choice of your own existence. I mean, I&#039;m 25 years old. I have a girlfriend. She is already starting to think in schools for the kids. Is that future human (my likely son) going to be free? Free in hyper-regulated society? Free under space-time restrictions? Humans are not free since they have boundaries and conditionings. There is a framework or set up (call it biased) in which we can be or not free. I seriously think only a highly upgraded prototypes of beings which we may not be able to imagine now, could have possibilities of being free by being integrated with that set up and controlling it. I&#039;m talking about infinite possibilities. Call it god or Neo or superman. Can you be free without really being able to rule your universe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My interpretation of your point with respect freedom goes as follows. I agree with understanding freedom as the abscence or lack of conditioning. However, there is no freedom from all possible scopes with respect the choice of your own existence. I mean, I&#8217;m 25 years old. I have a girlfriend. She is already starting to think in schools for the kids. Is that future human (my likely son) going to be free? Free in hyper-regulated society? Free under space-time restrictions? Humans are not free since they have boundaries and conditionings. There is a framework or set up (call it biased) in which we can be or not free. I seriously think only a highly upgraded prototypes of beings which we may not be able to imagine now, could have possibilities of being free by being integrated with that set up and controlling it. I&#8217;m talking about infinite possibilities. Call it god or Neo or superman. Can you be free without really being able to rule your universe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interview with Félix de Azúa by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=868&#038;cpage=1#comment-4845</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=868#comment-4845</guid>
		<description>Definitely. We are actually delighted to find this is useful to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely. We are actually delighted to find this is useful to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interview with Félix de Azúa by John Axl Palisoc</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=868&#038;cpage=1#comment-4843</link>
		<dc:creator>John Axl Palisoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=868#comment-4843</guid>
		<description>I would like to ask for your permission to take some of the information posted here. I will be using it for my Library-researched paper. Don&#039;t worry I will cite this source properly. Is that okay with you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to ask for your permission to take some of the information posted here. I will be using it for my Library-researched paper. Don&#8217;t worry I will cite this source properly. Is that okay with you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interview with Félix de Azúa by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=868&#038;cpage=1#comment-3537</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=868#comment-3537</guid>
		<description>Sure, no problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, no problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interview with Félix de Azúa by weird facts</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=868&#038;cpage=1#comment-3514</link>
		<dc:creator>weird facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophytogo.org/wordpress/?p=868#comment-3514</guid>
		<description>My partner grabbed a few lines from your site and added it on our site about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weird-facts.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;weird facts&lt;/a&gt;, is that OK with you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My partner grabbed a few lines from your site and added it on our site about <a href="http://www.weird-facts.net" rel="nofollow">weird facts</a>, is that OK with you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
